Головна › Опис › Робочий план

Робочий план

2016 2017 2018
Activities Description
of Action		 Worpackage Deliverable Description
of Deliverable		 WP Leader Del. Leader Total
duration (number of weeks)		 August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October November December January February March April May June July August September October
1.1.1 Establishing WG for analysis of
Ukrainian QA system		 WP1 P8 2
1.1.2 Monitoring extant state of Ukrainian QA system WP1 D1.1 Analysis of the extant state of Ukrainian QA system and/or its attributes, available
policies as well as processes, procedures and criteria covered so far for
assessment and accreditation of HEIs.		 P8 P13 8
1.2.1 Analysing legal frame, composing review WP1 D1.2 Review legal environment that regulates QA in Ukraine. Comparison of existing
regulations with respective norms of (proposed) new Law on Higher Education.		 P8 P16 8
1.3.1 Preparing survey to HEIs, report on results  WP1 D1.3 Questionnaire to Ukrainian HEIs to conduct national survey on structure and
functionality of internal QA systems and/or their attributes.		 P8 P8 10
1.4.1 Collecting data on best EU practices WP1 P8 10
1.5.1 Mapping existing system to legal frame and EU best practices WP1 D1.4 Analysis of the best European practise in the field of quality assurance in other
Eastern European countries under transition background.		 P8 P6 4
1.5.2 Preparing report on mapping results WP1 D1.5 Mapping existing system to legal requirements and EU best practices. P8 P11 4
2.1.1 Establishing WG to develop training package for HEIs and QA body WP2 P2 2
2.1.2 Developing training package for capacity building of HEIs
and QA body staff		 WP2 P2 12
2.1.3 Workshop to develop training package WP2 D2.1 Development of standards, evaluation tools and methods for external and internal
QA.		 P2/P4 P5 1
2.2.1 Training course for HEIs and QA body staff WP2 D2.2 The training sessions for the HEI units preparation for implementing internal QA
provisions and the national QA bodies.		 P4 P6 2
2.3.1  Forming HEI QA organizational structure WP2 D2.3 Pilot implementation of a typical model of QA organizational structure at HEIs. P4 P11, P13 12
3.1.1  Establishing WG for development of external QA mechanisms WP3 P5 2
3.1.2  Developing
Guidelines on policies and procedures for external QA system		 WP3 D3.1 Guidelines for policies and procedures of external QA system. P5 P6 8
3.2.1  Establishing QA body WG to develop external QA tools WP3 P5 2
3.2.2  Design of model for effective external QA WP3 D3.2 Model for ensuring effective external QA of HEIs educational activity field. P5 P16/P18 6
3.3.1  In-house training of QA body staff WP3 D3.3 In-house trainings for the QA responsible staff. Advisory visits of EU experts. P5 P6 36
4.1.1  Establishing WG to develop mechanisms ensuring internal QA at HEIs WP4 P13 2
4.1.2  Developing Guidelines (methodology) WP4 D4.1 The Guidelines for HEIs on structure, functions and procedures of internal QA
system 		 P13 P8 8
4.2.1  Establishing HEIs WGs to develop internal QA tools WP4 P13 2
4.2.2  Developing tools for internal QA WP4 D4.2 Development of road maps, QA policies, procedures, tools, standards and criteria
for internal assessment of HEI. Consultation with key stakeholders.		 P13 P11 6
4.3.1  In-house training of HEIs staff WP4 D4.3 In-house trainings for the QA responsible staff organized in UA HEIs, EU partners
involvement.		 P13 P9 36
5.1.1  Establishing HEI board and QA body expert panel to pilot
developed tools		 WP5 P1 2
5.1.2  Identifying 1 AP at each HEI and 2 HEIs to pilot at
programme and institutional level		 WP5 P1 2
5.1.3  Piloting the QA tools WP5 D5.1 Pilot implementation of developed QA system. Pilot external evaluation of HEIs.
Post evaluation improvement. Evaluation of final results of pilot activity by
national QA body. 		 P1 P10 10
5.1.3  Implementation of QA tools in consortium HEIs WP5 D5.1 Implementation of QA tools. Site visits. Evaluation of developed QA systems at
HEIs. Decision of evaulation internal body. Final report. Case study.		 P1 P11 20
5.2.1  Review of newly developed tools and mechanisms WP5 D5.2 Improvement of the QA internal system based on conclusion from the evaluation
reports from pilot implementations and implementations.		 P1 P8 4
6.1.1 Establishing QA units WP6 12
6.1.2  Procuring equipment WP6 D6.1 Appropriate level of adoptions of policies and regulations at both national and
institutional levels. 		 P11 P8 24
6.2.1  Approving HEIs QA strategy and procedures WP6 D6.2 Adoption of strategies, procedures and tools for internal QA system by the Academic
Councils of respective universities. 		 P11 P9 18
6.3.1  Design of recommendations to national QA regulations WP6 D6.3 Elaborating of set of recommendations to national QA bodies. P11 P16 18
7.1.1 Establishing dissemination team WP7 2
7.1.2 Elaborating dissemination plan WP7 D7.1 Elaboration of dissemination plans.  P3 P14 4
7.2.1 Design and administration of project website WP7 D7.2 Creation of a public visible web-site with information of project’s achievement.  P3 P8 84
7.3.1  Organization of information sessions WP7 D7.3 Information sessions in UA P3 P17 8
7.4.1  Publication of brochures, leaflets WP7 D7.4 Publication of e-newsletters and press releases in the local media. Distribution of
key information among stakeholders of HEIs. Workshops at HEIs.  		 P3 P12 8
7.5.1  Preparing survey to stakeholders WP7 D7.5 Providing regular feedback for further improvement and development from key
stakeholders.		 P3 P17 12
8.1.1 Establishing QCM team WP8 2
8.1.2 Elaborating QCM plan WP8 D8.1 Development of quality control and monitoring plan and tools for each activity
undertaken within the frames of the project		 P7 P5 4
8.2.1  Preparing reports per WP WP8 D8.2 Each WP lead partner will submit a report per WP, in which the achievements will be
highlighted and to which the deliverables will be attached. 		 P7 P7 10
8.3.1  Preparing report on developments WP8 D8.3 CEENQAA jointly with other EU partners will ensure a continuous and sustainable
quality monitoring of project developments with a rich pool of tools,
questionnaires and approaches to quality monitoring.		 P7 P6 8
8.4.1  Preparing report on feedback from key stakeholders WP8 D8.4 Basing on surveys to key stakeholders, analytical report on their feedback will be
produced three times during the project life-time.		 P7 P16 12
9.1.1 Signing partnership agreements WP9 N/A N/A P1 8
9.1.2 Establishing Governing Board WP9 P1 2
9.1.3  Governing Board meetings WP9 P1 10
9.1.4 Establishing Local Coordination Team, institutional WGs WP9 P1 4
9.1.5  Coordination meetings, reports WP9 P1 10 P14 P1 P13 P4 P3 P1 P13
9.2.1  Updating and implementing work plans WP9 P1 10
9.3.1 Establishing executive team WP9 P1 2
9.3.2  Managing day-to-day activity WP9 P1 96
9.3.3  Keeping records of activities and results WP9 P1 48